this is my ongoing wish list:
kitchenaid stand mixer
grill machine
cotton candy maker
espresso/steam frother machine
UV filter for my D60
remote shutter control for my D60
Monday, November 16, 2009
Sunday, November 15, 2009
movie talk
it was a pretty good experience watching 2012.
i wasn't expecting a good laugh out of it, but i did!
but there were way too many touchy scenes to soften up the intensity, and i didn't like that.
just hit me with everything at once. that's the way i like it.
the movie was long! 158mins, man!!
by the time it's done, my back, neck, legs were SO sore!
my chair was acting broken and smelly, which didn't help.
looking forward to a few releases!
there's kungfu fighting Sherlock Holmes on Xmas day.
Prince of Persia sometime next year around april or may?
apparently they're remaking Nightmare on Elm Street.
starting from Freddie's mob hunt to the nightly hauntings.
i still like the old Freddie much better.
some of the scenes look way too similar to the original version.
sorry, i just don't buy that.
originals are always better!
i wasn't expecting a good laugh out of it, but i did!
but there were way too many touchy scenes to soften up the intensity, and i didn't like that.
just hit me with everything at once. that's the way i like it.
the movie was long! 158mins, man!!
by the time it's done, my back, neck, legs were SO sore!
my chair was acting broken and smelly, which didn't help.
looking forward to a few releases!
there's kungfu fighting Sherlock Holmes on Xmas day.
Prince of Persia sometime next year around april or may?
apparently they're remaking Nightmare on Elm Street.
starting from Freddie's mob hunt to the nightly hauntings.
i still like the old Freddie much better.
some of the scenes look way too similar to the original version.
sorry, i just don't buy that.
originals are always better!
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
as the incompetent tech support would say: problem resolved - NOT!
so an update about the copyright issue.
my friend called me back twice.
the first time we talked and she said that took a picture of her Maggini model and her friend used that to make her business card.
and told me there's no way that's my viola in her card.
i told her i'm extremely surprised by that because of the antiquing and lighting being exactly the same on 2 instruments... which in reality is impossible.
then a couple hours later, she called me back a second time.
this time she talked to her friend who made the card.
turns out her friend finds her photo not suitable for printing, so her friend went online and looked around for a higher resolution picture.
somehow through some indirect link, she found my picture.
without asking for a consent for copyright redistribution, she took that and used it for the card.
and printed them out as a birthday present for my friend.
now that's all sorted out, she did promise me that her friend will not reuse that picture.
and since it's her birthday present, i gave her the ok to keep using the cards till they run out.
what a turn out.
my friend called me back twice.
the first time we talked and she said that took a picture of her Maggini model and her friend used that to make her business card.
and told me there's no way that's my viola in her card.
i told her i'm extremely surprised by that because of the antiquing and lighting being exactly the same on 2 instruments... which in reality is impossible.
then a couple hours later, she called me back a second time.
this time she talked to her friend who made the card.
turns out her friend finds her photo not suitable for printing, so her friend went online and looked around for a higher resolution picture.
somehow through some indirect link, she found my picture.
without asking for a consent for copyright redistribution, she took that and used it for the card.
and printed them out as a birthday present for my friend.
now that's all sorted out, she did promise me that her friend will not reuse that picture.
and since it's her birthday present, i gave her the ok to keep using the cards till they run out.
what a turn out.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
legals
in case if anyone else reads my blog or came to this blog from a search engine, looking for the Canadian Copyright Act clauses about photography copyright, here it is:
Link: Canada Copyright Act, Table of Contents
Link: PDF version of the Copyright Act
pages in the act relating to your photography rights:
Link: Term of Copyright in Photographs
Link: Author of Photograph
Link: Ownership of Copyright (Read subsection (2) )
Link: Moral Rights (Relates to explicit crediting to the author)
= = = = = = =
i have just sent an email to the friend, now asking for the contact of the person who made her business card.
i know i can take legal actions to have my picture's copyright performed now.
DV just helped me analyse the card, and he agrees that the lighting is exactly the same as the picture in my ad.
Link: Canada Copyright Act, Table of Contents
Link: PDF version of the Copyright Act
pages in the act relating to your photography rights:
Link: Term of Copyright in Photographs
Link: Author of Photograph
Link: Ownership of Copyright (Read subsection (2) )
Link: Moral Rights (Relates to explicit crediting to the author)
= = = = = = =
i have just sent an email to the friend, now asking for the contact of the person who made her business card.
i know i can take legal actions to have my picture's copyright performed now.
DV just helped me analyse the card, and he agrees that the lighting is exactly the same as the picture in my ad.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
badness
i just found out someone has used a picture that belongs to me in her business card.
and she is a colleague.
i'm sending an email to let her know that her friend who did the business card for her took my picture.
i hope her friend didn't charge her for making the card, or else i can sue her friend.
it seems like her friend scanned it off the Elegant Brides magazine and keyed out the background, making it a white background.
so of course, it'll look amazing because it took me a freaking 2 days worth of processing that picture.
how do i know it? because i recognized it the moment i saw her card, and she gave me her card.
i took out the magazine, my back up image file, and boom - there it is.
all the antiquing are exactly the same.
except her card was horizontally mirrored.
so not only finding out Anthropologie doesn't have shoes, there's also this copyright infringement...
i am pissed.
and she is a colleague.
i'm sending an email to let her know that her friend who did the business card for her took my picture.
i hope her friend didn't charge her for making the card, or else i can sue her friend.
it seems like her friend scanned it off the Elegant Brides magazine and keyed out the background, making it a white background.
so of course, it'll look amazing because it took me a freaking 2 days worth of processing that picture.
how do i know it? because i recognized it the moment i saw her card, and she gave me her card.
i took out the magazine, my back up image file, and boom - there it is.
all the antiquing are exactly the same.
except her card was horizontally mirrored.
so not only finding out Anthropologie doesn't have shoes, there's also this copyright infringement...
i am pissed.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
shoes shoes shoes!!

as i've showed Piggie, i've got these nice Pierre Michel shoes for $26.99 + tax!
so a pair of concert shoes under $30! plus there's airmiles and store points.
sorry about the blurriness. my macbook's webcam is low res.
should've just went straight to the shoe company.
spent an hour at pacific mall and they have nothing interesting at all.
if i pay at least $30 cash on a pair of chinese made shoes, might as well get it from a better source, and i can pay by card.
i also went to 2 winners for the past few days and found nothing good there.
oh well. shoe company is now my shoe hub! gotta love their clearance sale.
still, i really like the Bewitching Booties from anthropology.
hope there's time tomorrow to check them out before dinner!!
Monday, November 2, 2009
the hunt begins
i'm looking for a pair of replacement black concert shoes.
requirements:
under $50 (before taxes)
cute
comfortable
1-2" heels
can run with if necessary
so far, no luck at the shoe company and hillcrest mall.
tmr i'll check pacific mall before i go to the student's house.
hopefully there'll be something interesting.
Edit:
found these from Anthropologie...
it's called Bewitching Booties.
they're $222! but very nice!!
requirements:
under $50 (before taxes)
cute
comfortable
1-2" heels
can run with if necessary
so far, no luck at the shoe company and hillcrest mall.
tmr i'll check pacific mall before i go to the student's house.
hopefully there'll be something interesting.
Edit:
found these from Anthropologie...
it's called Bewitching Booties.
they're $222! but very nice!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)